SO? … SEW BUTTONS?
I can sew fairly
well – which may be surprising to some.
And iron.
In fact you might say I’m a regular domestic wonder. (And others will disagree heartily.)
And iron.
In fact you might say I’m a regular domestic wonder. (And others will disagree heartily.)
Those skills come about in part because, in my early
post-high-school education, I earned a degree in Merchandising at the venerable
Fashion
Institute of Technology in Manhattan.
There the core curriculum required courses in textile and
fashion design; courses that had a hands-on element as well as “book learnin’.”
So?
I became particularly
good at making box pleats. But that’s not the point today.
This is: It was
in those FIT classes I also learned a lesson that has informed my
thinking for decades since. And it has to do with –
Sewing buttons.
Every stitch that attaches a button uses a bit more thread, obviously.
- Use too little, and you’ve got a garment that risks coming apart before its time.
- But use more than necessary to securely fasten the button to the material and …
No, it’s not a
“stitch in time” takeaway – as much as I like Ben Franklin’s homespun (intentional
textile pun here) wisdom.
The TGIM Takeaway for today is –
There’s a cost
associated with unnecessary “extra” thread. You probably don’t think much
of it (as I did not) when you repair that dangling button using the hotel
giveaway sewing kit. But in the world of manufacturing such goods, the little
extras can add up.
Broadly speaking, that hotel hand-sewn button will consume
about a foot – 12 inches – of thread.
Certainly industrial machine sewing would be more economical.
However there are also thread-consuming issues of how many stitches … two- or
four-hole buttons … a shank around the sewn button …. Don’t get me started.
Point is: At the
point of purchase it’s hard for the consumer to eyeball the extra holding power
of more robustly sewn buttons. So all
that added thread comes at a cost in time and materials that ultimately add to
the cost of manufacture and thereby may make a garment’s price point at least
appear less desirable and competitive in the market.
The corollary to passing the cost along is, of course, to
deliver a better made garment and hold the line on price. But then you may
sacrifice profitability which doesn’t bode well for your enterprise in the long
run.
TGIM CHALLENGE: Look again at the many elements that go into
what you do and how you do it with an eye to opportunities where small savings
can add big.
It’s not simply a
“sew-sew” idea:
TGIM CHALLENGE IN ACTION: United Airlines, the top carrier out
of my neighborhood’s Newark Liberty Airport, expects to save $200,000 a year by
serving split cashews instead of whole ones in its hot nut cocktails for First
Class passengers.
“Customers don’t care
if it’s a whole nut or split in half,” CEO Jess Smisek told the Wall Street Journal earlier this summer.
“Well,” you may be thinking at this point, “while $200,000
is a big dollar figure, those nutty cashew savings seem like – uh – peanuts
compared to the overall billions expended running an airline. And the same goes
for the button-sewing.
“I question if the value of ‘small’ savings is really worth
all the effort that must be put into discovering, then implementing, such
cost-cutting efforts.”
TGIM ACTION IDEA: Go figure. To get a better feeling for how
“small” savings can really pay off, consider the simple math of cold, hard
dollars and cents.
Here’s a chart that dramatically points out what cost
savings represent in terms of sales.
Sales Values of Cost Savings
If profit margin
on Then savings
of $100
sales before
taxes net as much as sales
is: of:
10% ………………………. $1,000
9%
……………………….. 1,111
8%
……………………….. 1,250
7%
……………………….. 1,429
6%
……………………….. 1,667
5%
……………………….. 2,000
4%
……………………….. 2,500
3%
……………………….. 3,333
2% ……………………….. 5,000
1% ……………………….. 10,000
Get it? If your
enterprise earns 10% on sales, every operational dollar saved is worth $10 in
sales. And if your profit margin is 5%, every dollar saved is worth twenty dollars in added sales.
TGIM Takeaway: Holding the line on costs is vital – especially
with costs today beginning to swing upward with economic recovery.
In our observations centered on self-improvement, time
management and the like, TGIM and I often cite One Big Universal Law of Living that works like gangbusters in many aspects
of life. And in doing so we regularly comment that, while it sounds too simple
to be profound, to dismiss it would be short-sighted.
That One Big Universal Law of Living
has its dollars-and-cents parallel in the thread and nuts examples and the chart
above.
Just to remind you,
here it is one more time. Remember it as –
The Law of Slight Edge
Small changes,
Over time,
Make a big difference.
So that’s what. Hope the “small” ideas in this TGIM make a big difference to
you and your bottom line.
Geoff Steck
Chief Catalyst
Alexander Publishing & Marketing
Chief Catalyst
Alexander Publishing & Marketing
8 Depot Square
Englewood, NJ 07631
201-569-5373
tgimguy@gmail.com
201-569-5373
tgimguy@gmail.com
P.S. “Spare no expense to
make everything as economical as possible.” That somewhat contradictory
demand is alleged to have been made by Samuel Goldwyn (1884–1974). As well as
his movie making acumen, the film producer/Hollywood legend was so well known
for malapropisms, paradoxes, and other speech errors that they were called “Goldwynisms”.
(However, a number of them were reportedly written for him by the likes of
Charlie Chaplin.)
And speaking of sewing, Goldwyn got his immigrant start at
the turn of the 20th Century in the bustling garment business in
Gloversville, New York. Soon his innate marketing skills made him a very
successful salesman at the Elite Glove Company.
According to
legend, at a heated story conference at the height of his Hollywood power,
Goldwyn scolded someone -- in most accounts famed wise-cracking and witty
writer Dorothy Parker -- who recalled he had once been a glove maker and
retorted: "Don't you point that
finger at me. I knew it when it had a thimble on it!"