WILL YOU JOIN THE EFFORT TO
BAN DIHYDROGEN
MONOXIDE?
I am shocked – SHOCKED! – to learn that this is
still going on.
Over 15 years ago I cautioned everyone I could reach about
an early report I had heard about the dangers of the chemical compound, dihydrogen monoxide.
Back then, building on revelations made in the late 1980s, high
school student Nathan Zohner of Idaho conducted an experiment in science class
that revealed a serious problem. (It appears Zohner has since gone on to a
career at the Institute of Nuclear
Power Operations.)
He told his classmates and teachers that they should sign
his petition to ban a dangerous substance.
He explained in detail that this substance -- dihydrogen monoxide, in some write-ups
tagged DHMO -- is colorless, odorless, tasteless, and kills uncounted
thousands of people every year.
- Most of these deaths are caused by accidental inhalation.
- In its gaseous state, it can cause serious burns.
- Prolonged exposure to DHMO in its solid form causes severe tissue damage.
For those who have become dependent, withdrawal means
certain death.
It’s also --
… a component of acid rain
… contributes to soil erosion
… decreases the effectiveness of automobile brakes
… has been detected in some terminal cancer tumors
Despite these and similar known dangers, dihydrogen monoxide continues to be used
daily by industry, government, and even in private homes across the U.S. and
worldwide.
Some of the well-known uses are –
… as an industrial solvent and coolant, in nuclear power
plants
… by the U.S. Navy in the propulsion systems of some older
vessels
… by elite athletes to improve performance
…in the production of polystyrene
… in biological and chemical weapons manufacture
… as a spray-on fire suppressant and retardant
OSHA and similarly concerned watchdogs worldwide have issued
well-considered regs governing the use of dihydrogen
monoxide.
And yet people continue to not listen or think about this threat.
Fast forward to 2013:
Just last week two on-air presenters at a radio station in Florida (Gator
Country 101.9) alerted their listeners to the incontrovertible fact that dihydrogen monoxide was actually coming
out of their taps.
Their reward: These
publicly minded individuals were deemed “pranksters” and suspended indefinitely
by the station's general manager, who later elaborated –
"It is one thing
when radio stations change their format or other crazy things they do. But you
are messing with one of the big three, food, water or shelter. They just went
too far; I just knew I didn’t like that."
How about you? On
the summary of facts as I’ve laid them out before you, are you incensed enough to
–
Join in the campaign?
You can learn more, here: http://www.dhmo.org/
But, before you click away, consider this –
TGIM ACTION IDEA: Have you thought to inquire, "Just what
is dihydrogen monoxide?"
Or did you realize that the out-of-the-tap compound flowing
in Florida, and the item the petition-signing students and teachers signed
called for banning, is –
Plain Old H2O
– Water
Sorry ‘bout that. But …
I began TGIM #402 for April Fool’s Day with
the meant-to-be-humorous query:
“Did you know they took gullible out of the dictionary?”
I intended to leave it at that until I spotted the April 2 newsflash
about the rush-to-judgment outcome of the Florida DJs’ on-air April Fool’s Day prank.
That reminded me of my Zohner item from the last millennium
(although I find it hard to accept that it was that long ago) and I knew this TGIM
was forming up.
So I search-engined back to refresh my memory and, it turns
out, what I didn’t know in ’97 was that the title of Nathan’s prize-winning
project was, “How Gullible Are We?”
His conclusion:
Kinda obvious.
He asked 50 people if they supported a ban of dihydrogen monoxide.
- Forty-three (43) said yes,
- Six (6) were undecided,
- Only one (1) knew that the chemical was water.
Via a Zohner family blog, Nathan’s mother, Marivene,
recently added an enlightening coda to his high-school-era story. She says:
“The ‘rest of the
story’ is even better. He presented the ‘paper’ – 1 page – to 2 classes: His
Earth Science class & his English class, with the permission of the
teachers. 9th grade students, in April, so nearly done with the year. Guess
which teacher had to turn her back to the class to hide her grin – - yep, that
would be the English teacher!!”
As for us, in 2013, I guess if we too were fooled in our
enthusiasm to support the dihydrogen
monoxide ban, a starting point to applying the gullibility lesson young
Nathan highlighted is to recall one of TGIM #402’s Action Ideas and –
Remember: Being successfully foolish also allows learning to
happen. “There are no stupid questions.” But we seldom act as if that was a
given. Recognizing that human failing, feel free to take the lead and ask aloud
what you need to know, even when others are holding back.
Building on that, I’ll go –
Back to the future.
My original “Ban Dihydrogen Monoxide”
write-up was part of a twice-weekly e-blast newsletter called “Success On-Line.” (I shared editorial
responsibility for SOL with my friend Dr. Rob Gilbert.)
The SOL Success Strategy I posted “back
in the day” I’m going to keep intact for today's now-16-years-in-the-future --
TGIM TAKEAWAY: Keep your capacity for independent thought. Hone your critical thinking skills. Don't be a passive receiver of
information. Shun the politically
correct in search of all the information you feel you need to make sound,
well-informed judgments and decisions.
Ask the questions you need to ask.
Don't be docile as a
dodo. Remember, the dodo is extinct.
Dryly (still),
Geoff Steck
Chief Catalyst
Alexander Publishing & Marketing
Chief Catalyst
Alexander Publishing & Marketing
Englewood, NJ 07631
201-569-5373
tgimguy@gmail.com
201-569-5373
tgimguy@gmail.com
P.S. Although he
did not originate the basics of the strategy of presenting DHMO in an
exaggerated, eye-opening way, Nathan Zohner’s contribution in advancing the
awareness of our gullibility lives on. In recognition of his experiment, James
K. Glassman in his capacity of syndicated columnist in the venerable Washington Post coined the term
"Zohnerism" to refer to "the
use of a true fact to lead a scientifically and mathematically ignorant public
to a false conclusion."