CAN YOU NAME THE U.S. PRESIDENTS?
IN ORDER?
I can’t. Probably
will never be able to. Even with a visual aid.
But on this Presidents Day 2014 it feels like something
that, perhaps, a patriotic citizen ought to be able to do.
Who held the job before the guy who was before Lincoln?
Who replaced Ulysses Grant? Who followed Woodrow Wilson?
(The end of this post fills in the blanks.)
|
Of course I do know someone who, even more than simply
knowing the Presidents in order, uses the appeal of that bit of memory mastery
to demonstrate the potential of, and train others in feats of, monumental mental
dexterity.
Now if I could only remember his name …
Just joking. Of
course I know it. He’s two-time USA Memory Champion --
Or perhaps you met him live and in person at programs I was
involved with some years ago, produced locally by my friend Eric Taylor.
And in that regard, while I do not embody much of what Ron
preaches and practices, those among you who know Eric personally may recognize
that Eric did learn from the master and has achieved a level of proficiency,
particularly in the discipline of name retention.
But before this turns into an advertorial …
Let’s get back to the TGIM Presidents Day theme.
At those ‘live and in-person” events, after sharing his
refined-for-the-21st Century version of the 2500-year-old Roman
“loci” structured memory training and development strategy, Ron used physical
cues in the hotel ballroom where the training was taking place to aid the
attendees in recalling the Presidents, in order. And, by and large –
It worked. After
a drill or two, folks who were initially challenged (me, too) were pointing at
objects in the room and calling out –
George Washington,
John Adams,
Thomas Jefferson,
James Madison,
James Monroe,
John Quincy Adams,
Andrew Jackson,
Martin Van Buren,
and so on …
Impressive, right?
Well … You’ll note that at the outset of this TGIM
I allowed that I could not replicate the Presidents-in-order listing feat. So you might, quite correctly, conclude that
perhaps –
I’m not so enamored
of the idea.
Before I get down to why, I do want to say I don’t demean
the ability to do this kind of memorization. There’s a place for it and
usefulness to it, I’m sure. But it’s something I just can’t get enthralled
with.
In fairness, I do wish I had the personal horsepower to
incorporate the basics of face/name recall into my repertoire. It’s difficult
to argue with the legendary Dale Carnegie Principle #6 from How to Win Friends and Influence People:
“Remember that a person’s name
is to that person
the sweetest and most important
sound
in any language.”
And, when I have a “the face is familiar, but I just can’t
get the name” moment, I hang my head in shame when I recall Ron’s admonition, “My
dog remembers your face, right? And he’s never once gotten a name right.”
Bow, Oww. But
about the idea underlying the application of these memory hooks …
I stand with Albert
Einstein. (See TGIM #447. Seems I’ve stuck on Uncle Albert these days.)
Point is:In response to a reporter’s
query admitted not knowing the speed of sound, Einstein
is alleged to have expressed the view –
"I never commit to memory
anything that can easily be
looked up in a book."
Truth in quoting:
The more accurate citation of that sentiment, dating back to the New York Times
in the 1920s and alluded to by scholarly Einstein biographers ever since is:
“[I do not] carry such
information in my mind
since it is readily available in
books.
...The value of a college
education
is not the learning of many facts
but the training of the mind to
think.”
AH-HA! Moment: I know the first version of the quote because
I’ve heard it enough times to have it “memorized” albeit perhaps somewhat
imperfectly.
AH-HA! Moment in Action: I get to share the more accurate
version and get to use it to support my position because I’ve tried heartily to
train my mind to question and challenge and think. And then I took the time and
trouble to dig down through the search engine layers (somewhat the equivalent
of reference books in our wired world) to find trustworthy, vetted, authoritative
sources with citations.
TGIM PRESIDENTS DAY TAKEAWAY: We err greatly when we mistake
rote learning and accumulating “facts” for gathering knowledge and wisdom and reaching
for understanding.
Consider: No
doubt the Presidential giants who come easily to mind on this day embodied the
always-be-learning ethos.
Surely they had a remarkable command of much factual
information. But they didn’t let it sit idly in their heads or parrot it back
as the unyielding answer to challenges that confronted them. They explored what
they knew … added to that knowledge … adjusted their thinking for the
circumstances of the moment … gathered input and counsel from others and were
open-minded in evaluating it.
TGIM ACTION IDEA: On this Presidents Day, rather than fret
about whether we can pass the POTUS-listing test, we might consider it our
patriotic duty to take an oath to resolve to be more Presidential in our
thinking – emulating the best who held the office (whomever and whatever that
means to you; no doubt your list doesn’t match mine).
Hail to the Chief.
And hail and farewell for today to you.
Geoff Steck
Chief Catalyst
Alexander Publishing & Marketing
Chief Catalyst
Alexander Publishing & Marketing
Englewood, NJ 07631
201-569-5373
tgimguy@gmail.com
201-569-5373
tgimguy@gmail.com
P.S. They may all be giants. Of course you have an opinion about who are/were the Best Presidents and Worst Presidents.
We all do. And over
the years there have been repeated attempts to gather the objective opinion of
historians and political scientists to rank POTUS office holders, focusing on
presidential achievements, leadership qualities, failures and faults.
In the spirit of this TGIM message I encourage you
investigate on your own, if you wish. But as you proceed I’ll share a
cautionary observation voiced by John F. Kennedy (who, these days, ranks in the
top 20 but seldom in the top 10).
In 1962, speaking to David H. Donald, noted biographer of Abraham
Lincoln, Kennedy voiced dissatisfaction and resentment with historians who had
rated some of his predecessors. Kennedy said, "No one has a right to grade a President—even poor James
Buchanan—who has not sat in his chair, examined the mail and information that
came across his desk, and learned why he made his decisions."